Fellow bloggers Jon and Joel had some thoughts if you have been in a cave and need to get caught up.
As a surprise to no one, NYC Lawmakers are already calling for changes to protect triathletes in future races.
According to Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer:
"New Yorkers signed up for a triathlon - not a game of Russian Roulette," Stringer said. "Choosing to compete is a decision every athlete has to make for themselves - but it is the obligation of the city to make sure all potential risks are accounted for to the extent possible."
Personally, I feel Mr. Stringer is completely over the top in comparing triathlon to a game of Russian Roulette but does he have a point that maybe something needs to be done to mitigate possible risks during the swim?
I've seen a few ideas flowing around the triathlon message boards and was wondering what everyone here thinks?
- Should a competitor be able to prove they can swim the race distance by submitting previous race results?
- If competitor is a first timer should they be required a recommendation from a life guard or certified swim instructor?
- Or, if a first timer, should a pre-qualification swim be required to prove your swim-worthiness?
- Or should we just chalk this up as a tragic accident and not overreact and make the barriers to entry that much more challenging?
I spent this Sunday spectating at a local Sprint Tri with over 1500 competitors and it was reported about half of the entrants were first timers. I saw A LOT of people suffering on a short (non-wetsuit) 500M swim course. Lots of ugly out there and a few people were pulled out on kayaks as well.
Normally, I would flip the NYC Lawmaker the bird and tell him to mind his own freaking business but after giving it a little more thought would it be such a bad idea to implement some type of qualifier to prove swim worthiness?
Please let me hear your thoughts?
*Disclaimer - since this is my blog I am free to change my opinion and be hypocritical on this multiple times.
Thanks for Reading,